Dear Students,

With this evaluation form you have the opportunity to give your teaching staff feedback on his or her course or module. All answers are anonymous and you may answer all or just some of the questions as you wish. The evaluations are machine scored and the results are given to the teaching staff. The goal of the evaluation is to help make lasting improvements to the course. The goal of the evaluation is to help make lasting improvements to the course.

Please note: To advance to the next page of the questionnaire, please click on the bottom right button ‘Next>>’. Please DO NOT use the ‘Back’ button on your browser or your responses will be lost. If you cannot or prefer not to respond to a question, please select the option ‘not applicable’ (n.a.). Please mind to press 'Submit' once you have finished.

Thank you for your support.
 

Die folgende Frage bezieht sich nur auf die Anwesenheit in der Vorlesung. Teilnahme an Übungen/Hausaufgaben sollen hier nicht berücksichtigt werden. 

1.1

2Lecture

 

Design and Structure 

2.1The subject matter of individual sessions was logically sequenced.

agree completely

disagree completely



2.2The lecture is understandable with knowledge of the material covered in the prerequisite modules.

agree completely

disagree completely



2.3The lecture covers very little or no material from other courses/modules.

agree completely

disagree completely



2.4Objectives of the course are clearly stated in a timely manner.

agree completely

disagree completely



 
 

Communication of Content 

2.5Possibilities for practical application are adequately presented.

agree completely

disagree completely



2.6The relationship of course content to current research is clearly indicated.

agree completely

disagree completely



2.7Examples of course subject matter are clear and illustrative.

agree completely

disagree completely



2.8Lecture content was communicated clearly and understandably.

agree completely

disagree completely



2.9The projected timeframe for covering the course material is appropriate for me.

agree completely

disagree completely



 
 

Multimedia Tools 

2.10Outlines of lectures, presentations, overheads, etc. used in the lecture were understandable.

agree completely

disagree completely



2.11Supplemental preparatory and review materials for course lectures (overheads, transcripts, etc.) are overall good.

agree completely

disagree completely



2.12The course homepage is useful.

agree completely

disagree completely



3Lecture

 

Acquired Competence 

3.1I can reflect important concepts/content that are/is covered in this lecture.

agree completely

disagree completely



3.2I can give an overview of the subject matter of this lecture.

agree completely

disagree completely



3.3I think that I am able to adress problems typical to the subject matter of this lecture.

agree completely

disagree completely



 
 

Learning Conditions 

3.4The ratio of number of students to room size is appropiate.

agree completely

disagree completely



3.5The acoustics of the classroom are good.

agree completely

disagree completely



 
 

Scope and Level of Difficulty  

3.6The level of difficulty of course material is...

too high

too low



3.7The scope of material coverd in the course is...

too high

too low



3.8The pace at which course material is covered is...

too high

too low



3.9The amount of ECTS that are awarded for the course is in my opinion...

too high

too low



3.10The projected timeframe of the lecture is appropriate for me.

too high

too low



3.11

3.12

4Lecture

 

Overall Opinion 

4.1On a scale of 1 to 6, with 1 being the best and 6 the worst, what overall grade would you assign to the course?

1 (very good)

6 (fail)



 
 

Frequency of attendance 

4.2How often do you attend the lecture?

each course

never



4.3 What are the reasons for irregular attendance? (multiple selection is possible)


5Lecturer

 

The lecturer... 

5.1... was well prepared.

Agree completely

disagree completely



5.2... showed interest in students' success.

Agree completely

disagree completely



5.3... provided clear and understandable explanations of solutions.

Agree completely

disagree completely



5.4... can enthuse me for the lecture content.

Agree completely

disagree completely



5.5... was responsive to student comments and questions.

Agree completely

disagree completely



5.6... was readily available for questions/guidance.

Agree completely

disagree completely



5.7... is acoustically and linguistically understandable.

Agree completely

disagree completely



 
5.8My overall opinion of the lecturer is ...

very good

bad



 
 

Bitte beachten Sie, dass die Antworten auf die folgende Frage von den Dozenten gelesen und teilweise veröffentlicht werden. 

5.9


6Practice Sheets and Organization

6.1The level of difficulty of practice problems is appropriate.

agree completely

disagree completely



6.2Practice problems are adequately discussed.

agree completely

disagree completely



6.3Sample solutions are overall helpful.

agree completely

disagree completely



6.4Practice problems deepen my understanding of course material.

agree completely

disagree completely



6.5Practice problems are logically related to lecture material.

agree completely

disagree completely



6.6Practical applications are adequately presented.

agree completely

disagree completely



6.7Information about course exercises is always provided in a timely manner.

agree completely

disagree completely



7Tutorial

 

To ease the mapping of a tutorial to the group number on this form, there exists mapping information for some lectures.

Mapping information for this lecture: 

 

 

7.1

 
7.2How often do you attend the tutorial?

each course

never



 
7.3The tutorial deepens my understanding of course material.

agree completely

disagree completely



7.4Writing on the board, presentations, overheads, etc. used in the tutorial are legible.

agree completely

disagree completely



7.5Writing on the board, presentations, overheads, etc. used in the tutorial are effectively designed.

agree completely

disagree completely



7.6Class size (number of students) is appropriate for this kind of course.

agree completely

disagree completely



7.7The tutorial is a valuable addition to the lecture.

agree completely

disagree completely



7.8I have a deeper understanding of the subject matter now than before the tutorial.

agree completely

disagree completely



 
7.9The scope of material covered in the tutorial is...

too high

too low



7.10The level of difficulty of material covered is...

too high

too low



8Tutorial

 

Tutor 

8.1The Tutor presents the tutorials' content logical and understandable.

agree completely

disagree completely



8.2The Tutor takes interest in and responds to questions and comments.

agree completely

disagree completely



8.3The Tutor is well prepared.

agree completely

disagree completely



8.4The Tutor shows interest in students' success.

agree completely

disagree completely



 
 

Overall opinion 

8.5On a scale of 1 to 5, with 1 being the best and 5 the worst, what overall grade would you assign to the tutorial?

1

5



8.6On a scale of 1 to 5, with 1 being the best and 5 the worst, what overall grade would you assign to the tutor?

1

5



9General Information

 

Privacy Information: Please indicate your sex only if the lecture was attended by at least five male and five female students. 

9.1Sex

9.2

9.3

 
 

Comments (some answers will be published) 

9.4


9.5


9.6


9.7